tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-55815691684177841812024-03-13T20:29:20.922-07:00Tat Tvam Asi - Thou art That..!Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-47703578854881272272012-09-26T09:28:00.000-07:002012-09-26T09:28:42.810-07:00The immortality question! <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="post-body entry-content" id="post-body-3625468589723412997" style="background-color: white; color: #5c5c5c; font-family: Arial, Tahoma, Helvetica, FreeSans, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.4; position: relative; width: 498px;">
<div dir="ltr" trbidi="on">
Spoiler Alert: {This is an Atheist/Agnostic post, please refrain from reading if it might hurt your feelings}<br /><div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
Human species are obsessed in their current state of affairs with the questions relating to God and Religion. Sometimes that is just another reason for means to an end (political/personal). However, I am not interested in that aspect. But the core question. Why was the existence of God put into societal conscience at the first place!</div>
<div align="justify">
Well, lets journey back. It might not have much to do with Messiahs, whoever that may be Moses, Jesus, Muhammad or any new age gurus. They could have been anybody, they struck chord with the masses because of an inane human trait. The anthropocentric world view and the dire need to feel special lies in the core, may be even in the gene. To continue that argument, lets go to the beginning of human evolution, the earlier versions sustaining on hunting and foraging in the wild had FEAR embedded in them in their psyche. To overcome this fear, that adrenaline rush, they had to fool their primitive brain, they devised rituals, started worshipping the powers they had no control of, say Sun and other natural forces. They imbibed these rituals on their descendants with half-logic, half truths, myth and mysteries.<br /><br />Well, that was back then. What do we have now? Some brain washing and psycho-therapy by primitives or modern gurus was not all it took it develop complex religions and GOD figure! May be that was all it took along with some considerable time and stupidity, you might never know.</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
Few other aspects play crucial role to make most individuals as believers of God in their lifetime may be even for short periods of time.</div>
<div align="justify">
1)The idea of God as a Support figure. “God is there for me, even when no one is there”</div>
<div align="justify">
2)The idea of just world, “God is the master of this world and he rewards us with heaven and punish wrongdoers.”</div>
<div align="justify">
3)The idea of Beauty, (creationists): “Look at the beauty of nature, who else other than God, could have created it?”</div>
<div align="justify">
4)The idea of Life, “There had to be divine intervention to kick start evolution and bring life on earth”</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
This is in no way an exhaustive list, there might be more, it all stems from Fear, the fear of being left alone (in this cosmos, or in a relationship, or during death of kin). So, in these inconsequential scheme of events, men tried to make himself special, He might have moved on from geo-centric approach to helio-centric and then to nowhere, he still tweaked his ideas to continue to feel special.</div>
<h3 align="center" style="margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<span style="font-size: x-small; font-weight: normal;"><em>'Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying.'</em></span></h3>
<h3 align="center" style="margin: 0px; position: relative;">
<span style="font-size: x-small; font-weight: normal;"><em>-</em>Arthur C. Clarke</span></h3>
<ins><ins></ins></ins><br /><div align="justify">
<br />Meanwhile, men also devised another aspect. “soul”, The concept of something lasting beyond death, apart from the mundane ideas of heaven and hell. His unquenched requirement to be immortal, he made the idea of “<em>Karma</em>”, “<em>rebirth” </em>along with <em>atman</em>/soul, thereby immortality along with that, the idea of just world was also fixed. Since you clean up your mess in a complexly weaved tapestry hard to observe using human eyes. With that simple technique, the whole Hinduism was brought up under a strict moral and social code by upper class Brahmins and brought all other castes under submission to “live out their meaningless lives and wait for a Brahmin birth next time around to live quality life.”</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
Brian.L.Weiss(the famous psychiatrist from Florida of ‘<em>Many lives, many masters</em>’ fame) devised regression techniques to go to past lives of patients and solve traumas in their present lives. He may not be lying, the therapies might have worked wonders. After all, the whole department of psychiatry sometimes hold on to calming patients with lies with considerable effect [Placebo]. But, all that was required was telling mortals that, no you do get second chance, in fact multiple chances. <em>Play out! life is a game</em>, that is what Americans want to hear anyway.</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
There might be some hints in the nature for immortality or the concept of rebirth for the concept to hold some ground. The seasons, the phases of moon, cyclic observations of constellations all repeat, even though temporarily in a large time scale. Even, the big bang theory was stretched out to make room for pulsating theory and thereby immortality. {Aren’t you bored of repetitions?}</div>
<div align="justify">
No, the world does not end.</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
You are special.</div>
<div align="justify">
You are immortal.</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
These are the lines people want to hear. unfortunately, the world will end, you may be special to your mom, blame the “selfish gene” and lastly we all are mortals.</div>
<div align="justify">
<br /></div>
<div align="justify">
-Me</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-83545468251942632512010-12-13T12:52:00.001-08:002010-12-13T12:52:59.129-08:00Ganesha symbolism- you can think either way! :P<p align="justify"> </p> <p align="justify"><em>Om sri Ganesaya Nama:</em></p> <p align="justify"><a href="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_LTiuXLyuiwo/TQaHosDJdAI/AAAAAAAABTo/vjdUCW7tgqw/s1600-h/154832_10150092660377994_687772993_7225158_7035460_n%5B4%5D.jpg"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="154832_10150092660377994_687772993_7225158_7035460_n" border="0" alt="154832_10150092660377994_687772993_7225158_7035460_n" src="http://lh6.ggpht.com/_LTiuXLyuiwo/TQaHqdsy_DI/AAAAAAAABTs/2Rbd5G4cGwM/154832_10150092660377994_687772993_7225158_7035460_n_thumb%5B2%5D.jpg?imgmax=800" width="427" height="358"></a></p> <p align="justify">These are the various symbols associated with Ganesha, according to some interpreter. I don’t know who that is. Few may find few of the interpretations absurd, I find the whole exercise of interpreting futile as it failed to convince me in any manner, I am not trying to interpret it in a stronger manner per say, but going to ridicule it. If you can’t handle it, keep away from the site. “<a href="http://thou-art-that.blogspot.com/2009/01/disclaimer.html" target="_blank">Disclaimer</a>”. </p> <p align="justify">For you, intelligent reader, Read fully, there is a surprise in the end.</p> <p align="justify">I will go counter clock wise from left ridiculing all the explanations given in the image.</p> <p align="justify">Large ears- listen more,<strong> listen everything and don’t censor anything. #wikileaks</strong></p> <p align="justify">Axe- To cut off all bonds of attachment, <strong>resort to violence.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Small mouth- talk less, <em>(Elephant doesn’t talk, they trumpet-and its loud)</em> <strong>You don’t need a big mouth to have a big tummy.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Blessings- <strong>That hand is to say, STOP your non-sense. </strong>may be mine, oops</p> <p align="justify">Stomach- Peacefully digest good and bad in life, <em>(The function of large stomach is not to digest, but to act as a storage source:Elephant anatomy) </em><strong>Store all the good and bad, so that you can take revenge later.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Prasada- The whole world is at your feet and for your asking, <strong>The fast food joint serving junk food is just around the corner.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Mouse- <strong>Even a pest like mouse won’t eat the junk food, are you sure you want to eat it? (</strong><em>And, I would prefer Mallika sherawat to be shown if its <strong>desire</strong> you are talking!)</em></p> <p align="justify">Madaka- <em>The only meaning I could find is ‘intoxicating’ , is that what it is?</em></p> <p align="justify">Trunk- High efficiency and adaptability- <em>Really?</em>, <strong>Why do you need a trunk, if you have four hands,</strong><em> and I don’t want to see my nose getting dragged on the road- I’ve cold.</em></p> <p align="justify">One Tusk- Retain good and throw away bad, <strong>That is a pretty good way to explain scars from war.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Rope- To pull you nearer to the highest goal, <strong>to tie you to insanity.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Small eyes- concentrate- <strong>Evolutionary tool! so that nobody knows where you are looking.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Big head- Think big?? Really? <strong>Ravana had ten.!</strong></p> <p align="justify">So, please Refrain from interpreting, if you want to know how to interpret well, read along.</p> <p align="justify">A friend of mine named Gurudev had deciphered the <em>sloka</em> </p> <p align="justify"><em>“Vakra tunda Mahakaya surya kodi sama praba</em></p> <p align="justify"><em>Nirvignam kurume deva sarva karyeshu sarvada”</em></p> <p align="justify">Literally it means </p> <p align="justify">“Lord with curved trunk and a huge body and with a brightness of 10 million suns” </p> <p align="justify">“Oh lord, always may all my work be free of all obstacles”</p> <p align="justify">He then deciphers it as a science lesson a.k.a morning prayer long back as,</p> <p align="justify">When there is an imbalance of forces(ensued implosion against neutron degeneracy) in a massive star, the result is a supernova (a stellar explosion with brilliance of 10million suns). </p> <p align="justify">Read more @ <a href="http://www.hitxp.com/articles/veda/mahabharatha-alien-twist-god/#ixzz181cPZAKT">HitXP » Alien Twist to God – Part II - by Gurudev</a></p> <p align="justify">and this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova" target="_blank">wiki page</a></p> <p align="justify"><em>So, my sweet Ganesha, I am going to have my examination or my space travel today, so please don’t mess it up with shock waves and/or stellar dust.</em></p> <p align="justify">Now that is what I call deciphering and interpreting, not the Deepak Chopra style. So guys, Please refrain from interpreting, if you are not good enough for me.</p> <p align="justify"><em>-Santhosh K Ramachandran</em></p> <p align="justify">P.S: A quick Googling helped me find its some K.Krishnamurhty who interpreted the image.<em></em></p> <p align="justify"><em><br></em><em>P.P.S: <i>It's a Bird...It's a Plane...It's Superman..Na, its really a plane..!</i></em></p> <p align="justify"></p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-37603781058049493712010-11-05T12:34:00.001-07:002010-11-05T12:34:33.640-07:00Critical take on Hindu Gods par with today’s societal values in India.<p> </p> <p>Oh my ‘God’!, the title itself is so riot provoking! Am I out of my mind? May be not. Read the “<a href="http://thou-art-that.blogspot.com/2009/01/disclaimer.html" target="_blank">Disclaimer</a>” before you read further.</p> <p>The very first phrase in this blog may confuse a self proclaimed non Hindu if uttered by a Hindu. Since there are millions of Gods in Hinduism. <img style="border-bottom-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-top-style: none; border-left-style: none" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" alt="Smile" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_LTiuXLyuiwo/TNRcRw4Xe9I/AAAAAAAABSc/LweteyqCcCM/wlEmoticon-smile%5B2%5D.png?imgmax=800"> </p> <p>My take is on few of the famed gods by either myth or history. </p> <p><strong>Krishna</strong>- The most revered, the most philosophical, the most famed, the most adored, the most brilliant god of the pantheon. </p> <p>He is a polygamist, it is not acceptable in the present day society, illegal according to ‘Hindu marriage act’, wonder what Praveen Togadia thinks when he criticizes the Indian civil code granting polygamy for Islam. </p> <p>He broke Radha’s heart, that may or may not be acceptable depending on who you are. He supported polyandry of Draupadi citing some past life wish, citing mom’s word as the <em>final</em> word. He supported Arjuna to practice polygamy. His life as Casanova can incite sharp reactions if it was performed today.</p> <p><strong>Rama</strong>- The most noblest man ever lived. I doubt that! He left his wife in exile after a comment from his <strong>people.</strong> The most repeated argument by scholars is that “Rama was wrong as a husband, and he was right as a king.” I doubt that! He was definitely wrong as a husband, also, he was wrong was a king, as he was setting a horrible example of how to be husband. A simple man, might think, “ok! so it is right for me to leave my wife, if someone else mentions her as unchaste or infidel”. According to me, the king should be a leader who leads by setting an example, not as a person who should appease to every demand said/unsaid by his followers.</p> <p align="justify">Another wrong doing of Rama is the murder of king Bali by hiding. It was in no way, a symbol of heroism and chivalry. When Bali’s wife asked Rama about the sin, the reason cited by Rama is as follows, “ I will be born as Krishna in my next birth, and your husband will be a hunter and will kill me by hiding with an arrow thinking that I am a deer.” I wonder, which judge will take that as a reason for murder. </p> <p align="justify">Also, there are other minor wrong doings, including marrying Sita without his dad’s consent (It is a big thing in today’s society). Depriving Lakshman of his marital life with a newly wed Urmila. Murder of Ravana (a Brahmin) is also a sinful act, for which he did penances. His children was devoid of a parent throughout their life, Rama can be partly blamed.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Shiva</strong>- The powerful god is always given a negative connotation as a destroyer. For me he is the MAN in its every meaning. But in present day, he will find trouble. He lives in cremation ground, is a drug addict, is an alcoholic, is a nomad, is a hunter. How much of an outcaste he can be is shown in the six part <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0bGrvKVxac" target="_blank">documentary on ‘Aghoris’,</a> people who practice life similar to Shiva. Also, he would be criticized if he performs catastrophe after his wife’s death. Though according to the myth, he granted all their lives whose lives where lost during his anger and the insane “Tandava dance”. In the present society, anger itself is considered a vice. Hmmm.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Ganapati and Murugan- </strong>Shiva’s two sons, one is a celibate, one is a bigamist. Both are considered ‘not so good’ by today’s mothers. Muruga is also a runaway kid. A god running away from god parents. Hmmm. Another son of Shiva, Ayyapa is also a runaway kid. All the kids are going to mountains and forests. {I like it}.</p> <p align="justify"><strong>Vishnu</strong> has already been portrayed as Krishna and Rama, also when he was Mohini (a lady role), her main/only motive was cheating. She cheated on Asuras during “The churning of Ocean” episode, Come on!, they toiled and am sure worked harder than devas, and all they got was one of them ‘Rahu’ getting a taste of it before being beheaded. Reminds me of Al-Qaeda. Hmmm.</p> <p align="justify">Finally, <strong>Devi-</strong>a general representation of all goddesses, they are normally represented without clothes. But hardcore Hindu fanatics cannot even take cleavage in the main stream society throwing them out, slapping them, beating are all common practice. Also, wearing clothes over their bosom is a 20th century practice in the state of Kerala. </p> <p align="justify">Most of the gods became heroes through murders, they practice polygamy. Anger is a common trait. Cursing is an even more common trait. So many incidents. Runaway practices are common. Most of them have animals as vehicles, wonder, what PETA thinks.</p> <p align="justify">The interesting thing is that, most of the self proclaimed Hindus know all these facts. Scholars may call these as not facts, but just symbolism, a figurative depiction. Alright. I agree, but I was just doing a literal take. The list of such non-societal acts is endless. I was just picking on the main ones.</p> <p align="justify">-Santhosh K Ramachandran.</p> <p align="justify">P.S. My intent was not to hurt anyone, but to have a different view point. <img style="border-bottom-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-top-style: none; border-left-style: none" class="wlEmoticon wlEmoticon-smile" alt="Smile" src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/_LTiuXLyuiwo/TNRcRw4Xe9I/AAAAAAAABSc/LweteyqCcCM/wlEmoticon-smile%5B2%5D.png?imgmax=800"></p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-46724227370853722342010-10-10T16:59:00.001-07:002010-10-10T16:59:09.616-07:00Rebirth, love, soul-mates- Brian L Weiss.<p align="justify">Brian L Weiss is a smart psychologist, he is the author of “Many lives, many masters”. In that book, he discusses the concept of <strong>rebirth</strong>, perhaps it is for the first time a westerner is acknowledging and propounding the belief of rebirth to a widespread audience. Though the concept is prevalent and widely believed by believers of Buddhism and Hinduism. </p> <p align="justify">I am not completely bowled over by Dr. Weiss to begin with. The criticism in the scientific community towards him includes lack of peer review, the absence of scientific protocol in his experiments. Conceivably Weiss can argue that it is a metaphysical area that current protocols are handicapped to be used for his research. Weiss uses a method known as past life regression. He uses hypnosis on his patients/clients and the clients are said to have revealed their past life experiences. From memories. He in his book admits being skeptical in the beginning and was convinced when one client during the hypnosis mentions about his own child’s death. A personal tone can always mislead even scientists of high skepticism. </p> <p align="justify">He was able to ‘evidently’ remove nightmares and traumas of his clients by this technique. Here is the catch. A late researcher had also mentioned, these revelations from the clients and their traumas was result of their own ‘imagination’ and not past-life memories. It is arguable. It cannot be proved. The researcher also compared such memories to dreams. Though few psychic people claim dreams to have hidden meanings and blah blah. I would go with Freudian view that the dreams are part of “wish fulfillment” attempts by the unconscious. Again, our own imagination, similar to an illusion like déjà vu.</p> <p align="justify">Probably, Dr. Weiss was able to successfully remove fears and nightmares with the help of psychoanalysis just like many other psychiatric practitioners. That doesn’t entitle to him to have proved the fears stemming from past life. The most famous reincarnation researcher Ian Stevenson had a more methodical research, he did his case studies on children. He never was a firm believer of reincarnation, but he was into science of it than superstition. He made strong supporting reports of birth marks and congenital defects as the cause of past life incidents as he identified a deceased person’s family from a child’s memories by using a wide network of volunteers.</p> <p align="justify">Rebirth and reincarnation will be a matter of speculation, science and superstition for quite sometime. We all can only speculate and (not)believe.</p> <p align="justify">My take is not on rebirth, but to the direction which Weiss stretched his study from there, in his subsequent books about soul-mates, love, spirituality etc. </p> <p align="justify">I started the article mentioning Weiss as a smart psychiatric practitioner. He identified/believed that anxiety or frustration was the major trouble for human problems(just like Buddha and Schopenhauer). </p> <p align="justify">A psychiatrist (also an astrologer, in India) is THE resort for people in metal trauma resulting from various reasons. The major reasons being the worry of future, death and such anxieties. As a psychiatrist, he wanted to reply to the questions posed by his clients and help them, hence he adopted the theory of rebirth. Fair enough, as long as it serves purpose. He was able to quench their thirst and say “its not over”, there will be more chances for you to live it out. </p> <p align="justify">I guess more questions started coming to Weiss. More that had to do with love (may be lust too). This <em>chemical imbalance</em> his clients had dragged him down some unconvincing roads. He had adopted the theory of <strong>soul</strong> along with the ‘rebirth’ theory. He stretched it with the concept of soul-mate. His idea that they come back and join during every life. IF your love stint is not <em>working, </em>then that is due to the fact that the person you are dating is not your soul-mate. Wait and you will meet your soul mate. Makes sense? It was utter stupidity. May be that might have satisfied few of his clients or his own inquisitive mind for a while. </p> <p align="justify">He hit a dead-end when whiny women started coming with claims of loving more than one person. After pondering, he stretched it with theory of multiple soul-mate theory. No trouble, along with that he mentioned that the soul-mates come to your life for a purpose and then they leave you, once their deed is done. So his advice was not to worry about when someone leaves you geographically, emotionally or even mortally. Bulls eye. No trouble there.</p> <p align="justify">That might have worked wonders with his patients, so much so that he himself believed it completely and got the confidence to even write books on it. He went on with saying love is the only real thing existing in the world. He was preaching many things probably along with it, love (<em>chemical imbalance</em> as many call it), tolerance and lots of other stuff. </p> <p align="justify">However flawed or untrue his findings and writings may be, his intentions was genuinely noble to solve the mental troubles which had inflicted on thousands of his patients. He might have been even successful in solving many troubles using this theory along with his psychoanalysis. He may not be able to prove it to the scientific community, but at the same time, no one can disprove him just like the argument surrounding a personal God. </p> <p align="justify">-Santhosh K Ramachandran</p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-21277349436205064112010-04-24T15:25:00.001-07:002010-04-24T15:25:52.842-07:00Astrology, math? science? truth?<p> </p> <p align="justify">My friend had to dump his girl friend because, an astrologer said it is not good for his family and his life. Another friend of mine quit smoking because the astrologer said that his life will end if he don’t quit. He would not dare quit if his friends said so, he would not quit because his doctor said so, but because his astrologer said so.</p> <p align="justify">We need to remember this fact, his friends are his well wishers, his doctor is a trained medical professional. He is ready to risk by disregarding their words. But he would not disregard a man with a chalk, thirteen square boxes and few shells(Stuff old school astrologers use for drawing the birth chart).</p> <p align="justify">Why?</p> <p align="justify">Why is that, Indians blindly believe astrologers, most of them reply like “why risk it?” </p> <p align="justify">Cynics counter, How the hell can he predict my future when he can’t say which movie is being played in the theater next to him. But the same cynic will follow what astrologer said bitching about him on the outside.</p> <p align="justify">If a radical places a gun in an astrologer’s mouth and ask about the astrologer’s future. The astrologer can only stutter.</p> <p align="justify">There is a small folk story regarding a small evil boy and a scholar. The small boy had a small live bird cupped and hidden in his hands, he asks the scholar whether the bird is alive or dead! His aim is to prove the scholar wrong. He is ready to clasp and kill the bird if the scholar says it is alive, and leave it alive if the scholar says that it is dead. The scholar smiled and said the following words “It is in your hands”.</p> <p align="justify">In a way, all of us believe that the life we are living is entirely in our hands, the choices we make which comes from the chemical reactions in the brain which computes all the different permutations and decide whether to have either Coke or Pepsi. What is the role of astrologers then? And how are they able to judge the course of chemical reactions which is going to happen in our brain. How are our marriage, career, education and happiness controlled by the planets which are far far away?</p> <p align="justify">Let me look into this in a critical manner which a person of no background of astrology can still read (atleast that is what I am going to try.)</p> <p align="justify">To begin with the birth time, which is used for all the calculations. There are many different( I think four or five) birth time used for calculations for an individual. The time when head of the baby touches the ground for the first time, the time when the baby cries for the first time, the time at which the umbilical cord is being cut, the time at which the semen and egg unite(I don’t think that is easy to find out). The first three time can be taken for calculations. “The time aspect” of the birth is completely <strong>scientific</strong> since it is “time”. No argument over there. </p> <p align="justify">The birth place, which is the second important thing is taken with regard to latitude and longitude. It is a completely accepted scientific method to describe a position. The astrologer uses these two inputs to formulate the birth chart, or the position of different planets and constellations. By planets, I mean the Sanskrit word “graham” which can be translated to house, which can be extended to ‘which protects you’, ‘which can influence you’, ‘which can arrest/inhibit you’ etc. In that meaning, Sun, Moon, Earth are all planets. In Vedic astrology, a total of 9 planets are considered. Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Rahu and Ketu. Earth is not considered because, the observer is in the Earth. There are two imaginary planets as well in Vedic astrology “rahu” and “ketu”. They are not exactly imaginary rather invisible, They are basically South lunar node and North lunar node. The position of these planets are “calculated” based on the time and place of birth with respect to constellations. This part is completely scientific, because it is astronomy. Any astrologer can reproduce the same results at all times. This proves one of the basis of scientific study which is reproducibility. I put the word calculated in quotes because the process of calculation is purely mathematical, what is done in figuring the birth chart is also purely mathematical. </p> <p align="justify">Now comes the attribution, every planet is given qualities/characteristics/attributes, every planet is given further more attributes based on its position. Who has given this attributes, no body has an answer. Whether it is scientific, Nobody is sure. But experience does seem to accept the truth of these attributes. These attributes is said to have an impact on physical, mental and spiritual characteristics of a person. That is the planets or ‘graham’ influence these three aspects of a human being. It also influences the phase of a human life due to the positioning of planets at a given point of time based on the birth chart of that person.</p> <p align="justify">If you have a doubt on whether the planet has an effect on you. I have a few questions. Does the wall color on your room impact you? Does the wallpaper on your screen impact you? Does the season impact you? Does the day of the week impact you? If these trivial(may be not) things can impact you in a tangible way. Only thing I can say is that “everything in this world impacts everything else”.</p> <p align="justify">Now comes the funny part, the prediction part performed by the astrologers, it is completely <strong>unscientific</strong>. The horoscopes given on magazines, websites on how your day is going to be is even more absurd. The prediction part performed by the astrologers are based on his knowledge about the attributes, his knowledge about the situation etc. Just like any doctor, or engineer, if he is good in his knowledge, he will be able to give a sound advice or able to mention the situation. But still, prediction is unscientific. If you ask an engineer whether plastic is better or metal. He may or may not answer. Because a thousand factors need to be considered, the application, the metal under consideration, so on and so forth. Just like there is a good doctor, there is a good astrologer as well who knows his science.</p> <p align="justify">I don’t want to keep on write and bore you. But one question might be lingering in everyone’s inquisitive minds. Why is it that the birth can determine the aspects of one’s complete life?</p> <p align="justify"> My honest answer would be “Karma”. The actions of your past life determine the birth of your present life, and thereby the implications in it, If you ask me whether that is fair, yes it is fair. The world or universe has to be fair. Your actions are not determined by any planet. Do good deeds, it’ll protect you.(Stop preaching, Santhosh!) </p> <p align="justify">Coming back to astrology, let me say one last point, Astrology is called Jyotisha in Sanskrit. Which means study of light or rays. The light and rays given out by the planets. I guess. LOL. </p> <p align="justify">“Astrology is an ocean which extends from one horizon to the other both in the perceivable three-dimensional space frame and time frame. We are an observer observing finite number of elements observed by infinite number of elements.”</p> <p align="justify">-Santhosh K Ramachandran</p> <p>"Like gravity, karma is so basic we often don't even notice it."<br><strong>-</strong> Sakyong Mipham</p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-4517414447525161502009-10-17T20:10:00.001-07:002009-10-17T20:10:25.772-07:00Who am I..? Naan yar?<p align="justify"> </p> <p align="justify">A friend of mine passed away last Saturday 10/10/09. It has sunk in slowly and sadly. Thanks to the material world and its demands and ability to preoccupy human mind. It was the first tragic-death of someone very close to me after I turned 14. I have read the book “Zen and the art of Motorcycle Maintenance”, and In the very end in fact in the epilogue, the narrator expresses his son’s death. I read those passage again and again and it helped me to be transcendent to my friend’s death.</p> <p align="justify">But yesterday, I spoke to my brother for an hour, during the conversation he mentioned something about Ramana Mahirshi, I’ve heard or known about him as a saint practicing silence, but that was it. But out of curiosity, I googled him, and found a thought which had occurred to his mind when he was 13 before his enlightenment when his father suddenly fell seriously ill and unexpectedly died several days later at the age of 42, for some hours after his father's death he contemplated the matter of death, and how his father's body was still there, but the 'I' was gone from it. </p> <p align="justify">I researched a bit more, and I got to read a conversation titled “Who am I”. It was the best spiritual conversation I had ever read. Precise and concise. I am copying it with no notice or request, I don’t think it is an act of plagiarism, it is just a mere simple way of spreading the priceless truth.</p> <p align="justify">So, the context is that, the Mahirshi(Saint) was met by a government employee who was also a philosopher, he wanted spiritual guidance from the master, so the conversation was in the form of questions and answers to understand self-enquiry. As Master was not talking then, not because of any vow he had taken, but because he did not have the inclination to talk, he answered the questions put to him by gestures, and when these were not understood, by writing.</p> <p align="justify">Be patient enough to read the complete conversation. </p> <p align="justify">1 . <em>Who am I ?</em> <p align="justify">The gross body which is composed of the seven humours (dhatus), I am not; the five cognitive sense organs, viz. the senses of hearing, touch, sight, taste, and smell, which apprehend their respective objects, viz. sound, touch, colour, taste, and odour, I am not; the five cognitive sense-organs, viz. the organs of speech, locomotion, grasping, excretion, and procreation, which have as their respective functions speaking, moving, grasping, excreting, and enjoying, I am not; the five vital airs, prana, etc., which perform respectively the five functions of in-breathing, etc., I am not; even the mind which thinks, I am not; the nescience too, which is endowed only with the residual impressions of objects, and in which there are no objects and no functioning's, I am not. <p align="justify">2. <em>If I am none of these, then who am I?</em> <p align="justify">After negating all of the above-mentioned as 'not this', 'not this', that Awareness which alone remains - that I am. <p align="justify">3. <em>What is the nature of Awareness?</em> <p align="justify">The nature of Awareness is existence-consciousness-bliss <p align="justify">4. <em>When will the realization of the Self be gained?</em> <p align="justify">When the world which is what-is-seen has been removed, there will be realization of the Self which is the seer. <p align="justify">5. <em>Will there not be realization of the Self even while the world is there (taken as real)?</em> <p align="justify">There will not be. <p align="justify">6. <em>Why?</em> <p align="justify">The seer and the object seen are like the rope and the snake. Just as the knowledge of the rope which is the substrate will not arise unless the false knowledge of the illusory serpent goes, so the realization of the Self which is the substrate will not be gained unless the belief that the world is real is removed. <p align="justify">7. <em>When will the world which is the object seen be removed?</em> <p align="justify">When the mind, which is the cause of all cognition's and of all actions, becomes quiescent, the world will disappear. <p align="justify">8. <em>What is the nature of the mind?</em> <p align="justify">What is called 'mind' is a wondrous power residing in the Self. It causes all thoughts to arise. Apart from thoughts, there is no such thing as mind. Therefore, thought is the nature of mind. Apart from thoughts, there is no independent entity called the world. In deep sleep there are no thoughts, and there is no world. In the states of waking and dream, there are thoughts, and there is a world also. Just as the spider emits the thread (of the web) out of itself and again withdraws it into itself, likewise the mind projects the world out of itself and again resolves it into itself. When the mind comes out of the Self, the world appears. Therefore, when the world appears (to be real), the Self does not appear; and when the Self appears (shines) the world does not appear. When one persistently inquires into the nature of the mind, the mind will end leaving the Self (as the residue). What is referred to as the Self is the Atman. The mind always exists only in dependence on something gross; it cannot stay alone. It is the mind that is called the subtle body or the soul (jiva). <p align="justify">9. <em>What is the path of inquiry for understanding the nature of the mind?</em> <p align="justify">That which rises as 'I' in this body is the mind. If one inquires as to where in the body the thought 'I' rises first, one would discover that it rises in the heart. That is the place of the mind's origin. Even if one thinks constantly 'I' 'I', one will be led to that place. Of all the thoughts that arise in the mind, the 'I' thought is the first. It is only after the rise of this that the other thoughts arise. It is after the appearance of the first personal pronoun that the second and third personal pronouns appear; without the first personal pronoun there will not be the second and third. <p align="justify">10. <em>How will the mind become quiescent?</em> <p align="justify">By the inquiry 'Who am I?'. The thought 'who am I?' will destroy all other thoughts, and like the stick used for stirring the burning pyre, it will itself in the end get destroyed. Then, there will arise Self-realization. <p align="justify">11. <em>What is the means for constantly holding on to the thought 'Who am I?'</em> <p align="justify">When other thoughts arise, one should not pursue them, but should inquire: 'To whom do they arise?' It does not matter how many thoughts arise. As each thought arises, one should inquire with diligence, "To whom has this thought arisen?". The answer that would emerge would be "To me". Thereupon if one inquires "Who am I?", the mind will go back to its source; and the thought that arose will become quiescent. With repeated practice in this manner, the mind will develop the skill to stay in its source. When the mind that is subtle goes out through the brain and the sense-organs, the gross names and forms appear; when it stays in the heart, the names and forms disappear. Not letting the mind go out, but retaining it in the Heart is what is called "inwardness" (antar-mukha). Letting the mind go out of the Heart is known as "externalization" (bahir-mukha). Thus, when the mind stays in the Heart, the 'I' which is the source of all thoughts will go, and the Self which ever exists will shine. Whatever one does, one should do without the egoity "I". If one acts in that way, all will appear as of the nature of Siva (God). <p align="justify">12. <em>Are there no other means for making the mind quiescent?</em> <p align="justify">Other than inquiry, there are no adequate means. If through other means it is sought to control the mind, the mind will appear to be controlled, but will again go forth. Through the control of breath also, the mind will become quiescent; but it will be quiescent only so long as the breath remains controlled, and when the breath resumes the mind also will again start moving and will wander as impelled by residual impressions. The source is the same for both mind and breath. Thought, indeed, is the nature of the mind. The thought "I" is the first thought of the mind; and that is egoity. It is from that whence egoity originates that breath also originates. Therefore, when the mind becomes quiescent, the breath is controlled, and when the breath is controlled the mind becomes quiescent. But in deep sleep, although the mind becomes quiescent, the breath does not stop. This is because of the will of God, so that the body may be preserved and other people may not be under the impression that it is dead. In the state of waking and in samadhi, when the mind becomes quiescent the breath is controlled. Breath is the gross form of mind. Till the time of death, the mind keeps breath in the body; and when the body dies the mind takes the breath along with it. Therefore, the exercise of breath-control is only an aid for rendering the mind quiescent (manonigraha); it will not destroy the mind (manonasa). <p align="justify">Like the practice of breath-control. meditation on the forms of God, repetition of mantras, restriction on food, etc., are but aids for rendering the mind quiescent. <p align="justify">Through meditation on the forms of God and through repetition of mantras, the mind becomes one-pointed. The mind will always be wandering. Just as when a chain is given to an elephant to hold in its trunk it will go along grasping the chain and nothing else, so also when the mind is occupied with a name or form it will grasp that alone. When the mind expands in the form of countless thoughts, each thought becomes weak; but as thoughts get resolved the mind becomes one-pointed and strong; for such a mind Self-inquiry will become easy. Of all the restrictive rules, that relating to the taking of sattvic food in moderate quantities is the best; by observing this rule, the sattvic quality of mind will increase, and that will be helpful to Self-inquiry. <p align="justify">13. <em>The residual impressions (thoughts) of objects appear wending like the waves of an ocean. When will all of them get destroyed?</em> <p align="justify">As the meditation on the Self rises higher and higher, the thoughts will get destroyed. <p align="justify">14. <em>Is it possible for the residual impressions of objects that come from beginning-less time, as it were, to be resolved, and for one to remain as the pure Self?</em> <p align="justify">Without yielding to the doubt "Is it possible, or not?", one should persistently hold on to the meditation on the Self. Even if one be a great sinner, one should not worry and weep "Oh! I am a sinner, how can I be saved?"; one should completely renounce the thought "I am a sinner"; and concentrate keenly on meditation on the Self; then, one would surely succeed. There are not two minds - one good and the other evil; the mind is only one. It is the residual impressions that are of two kinds - auspicious and inauspicious. When the mind is under the influence of auspicious impressions it is called good; and when it is under the influence of inauspicious impressions it is regarded as evil. <p align="justify">The mind should not be allowed to wander towards worldly objects and what concerns other people. However bad other people may be, one should bear no hatred for them. Both desire and hatred should be eschewed. All that one gives to others one gives to one's self. If this truth is understood who will not give to others? When one's self arises all arises; when one's self becomes quiescent all becomes quiescent. To the extent we behave with humility, to that extent there will result good. If the mind is rendered quiescent, one may live anywhere. <p align="justify">15. <em>How long should inquiry be practiced?</em> <p align="justify">As long as there are impressions of objects in the mind, so long the inquiry "Who am I?" is required. As thoughts arise they should be destroyed then and there in the very place of their origin, through inquiry. If one resorts to contemplation of the Self unintermittently, until the Self is gained, that alone would do. As long as there are enemies within the fortress, they will continue to sally forth; if they are destroyed as they emerge, the fortress will fall into our hands. <p align="justify">16. <em>What is the nature of the Self?</em> <p align="justify">What exists in truth is the Self alone. The world, the individual soul, and God are appearances in it. like silver in mother-of-pearl, these three appear at the same time, and disappear at the same time. The Self is that where there is absolutely no "I" thought. That is called "Silence". The Self itself is the world; the Self itself is "I"; the Self itself is God; all is Siva, the Self. <p align="justify">17. <em>Is not everything the work of God?</em> <p align="justify">Without desire, resolve, or effort, the sun rises; and in its mere presence, the sun-stone emits fire, the lotus blooms, water evaporates; people perform their various functions and then rest. Just as in the presence of the magnet the needle moves, it is by virtue of the mere presence of God that the souls governed by the three (cosmic) functions or the fivefold divine activity perform their actions and then rest, in accordance with their respective karmas. God has no resolve; no karma attaches itself to Him. That is like worldly actions not affecting the sun, or like the merits and demerits of the other four elements not affecting all pervading space. <p align="justify">18. <em>Of the devotees, who is the greatest?</em> <p align="justify">He who gives himself up to the Self that is God is the most excellent devotee. Giving one's self up to God means remaining constantly in the Self without giving room for the rise of any thoughts other than that of the Self. Whatever burdens are thrown on God, He bears them. Since the supreme power of God makes all things move, why should we, without submitting ourselves to it, constantly worry ourselves with thoughts as to what should be done and how, and what should not be done and how not? We know that the train carries all loads, so after getting on it why should we carry our small luggage on our head to our discomfort, instead of putting it down in the train and feeling at ease? <p align="justify">19. <em>What is non-attachment?</em> <p align="justify">As thoughts arise, destroying them utterly without any residue in the very place of their origin is non-attachment. Just as the pearl-diver ties a stone to his waist, sinks to the bottom of the sea and there takes the pearls, so each one of us should be endowed with non-attachment, dive within oneself and obtain the Self-Pearl. <p align="justify">20. <em>Is it not possible for God and the Guru to effect the release of a soul?</em> <p align="justify">God and the Guru will only show the way to release; they will not by themselves take the soul to the state of release. In truth, God and the Guru are not different. Just as the prey which has fallen into the jaws of a tiger has no escape, so those who have come within the ambit of the Guru's gracious look will be saved by the Guru and will not get lost; yet, each one should by his own effort pursue the path shown by God or Guru and gain release. One can know oneself only with one's own eye of knowledge, and not with somebody else's. Does he who is Rama require the help of a mirror to know that he is Rama? <p align="justify">21. <em>Is it necessary for one who longs for release to inquire into the nature of categories (tattvas)?</em> <p align="justify">Just as one who wants to throw away garbage has no need to analyze it and see what it is, so one who wants to know the Self has no need to count the number of categories or inquire into their characteristics; what he has to do is to reject altogether the categories that hide the Self. The world should be considered like a dream. <p align="justify">22. <em>Is there no difference between waking and dream?</em> <p align="justify">Waking is long and a dream short; other than this there is no difference. Just as waking happenings seem real while awake. so do those in a dream while dreaming. In dream the mind takes on another body. In both waking and dream states thoughts. names and forms occur simultaneously. <p align="justify">23. <em>Is it any use reading books for those who long for release?</em> <p align="justify">All the texts say that in order to gain release one should render the mind quiescent; therefore their conclusive teaching is that the mind should be rendered quiescent; once this has been understood there is no need for endless reading. In order to quieten the mind one has only to inquire within oneself what one's Self is; how could this search be done in books? One should know one's Self with one's own eye of wisdom. The Self is within the five sheaths; but books are outside them. Since the Self has to be inquired into by discarding the five sheaths, it is futile to search for it in books. There will come a time when one will have to forget all that one has learned. <p align="justify">24. <em>What is happiness?</em> <p align="justify">Happiness is the very nature of the Self; happiness and the Self are not different. There is no happiness in any object of the world. We imagine through our ignorance that we derive happiness from objects. When the mind goes out, it experiences misery. In truth, when its desires are fulfilled, it returns to its own place and enjoys the happiness that is the Self. Similarly, in the states of sleep, samadhi and fainting, and when the object desired is obtained or the object disliked is removed, the mind becomes inward-turned, and enjoys pure Self-Happiness. Thus the mind moves without rest alternately going out of the Self and returning to it. Under the tree the shade is pleasant; out in the open the heat is scorching. A person who has been going about in the sun feels cool when he reaches the shade. Someone who keeps on going from the shade into the sun and then back into the shade is a fool. A wise man stays permanently in the shade. Similarly, the mind of the one who knows the truth does not leave Brahman. The mind of the ignorant, on the contrary, revolves in the world, feeling miserable, and for a little time returns to Brahman to experience happiness. In fact, what is called the world is only thought. When the world disappears, i.e. when there is no thought, the mind experiences happiness; and when the world appears, it goes through misery. <p align="justify">25. <em>What is wisdom-insight (jnana-drsti)?</em> <p align="justify">Remaining quiet is what is called wisdom-insight. To remain quiet is to resolve the mind in the Self. Telepathy, knowing past, present and future happenings and clairvoyance do not constitute wisdom-insight. <p align="justify">26. <em>What is the relation between desirelessness and wisdom?</em> <p align="justify">Desirelessness is wisdom. The two are not different; they are the same. Desirelessness is refraining from turning the mind towards any object. Wisdom means the appearance of no object. In other words, not seeking what is other than the Self is detachment or desirelessness; not leaving the Self is wisdom. <p align="justify">27. <em>What is the difference between inquiry and meditation?</em> <p align="justify">Inquiry consists in retaining the mind in the Self. Meditation consists in thinking that one's self is Brahman, existence-consciousness-bliss. <p align="justify">28. <em>What is release?</em> <p align="justify">Inquiring into the nature of one's self that is in bondage, and realizing one's true nature is release. </p> <p align="justify"> </p> <p align="justify">-An inquirer.</p> <p align="justify">Santhosh K Ramachandran</p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-70328446413554721372009-07-18T12:14:00.001-07:002009-07-18T12:14:19.117-07:00My concept of God, My idea of Hinduism<p align="justify">This is one of the topics, which I wanted to write for a long time. I was always amazed by the concept of God, How different people perceive it, How the concept is perceived the world over. How the communists see it, How atheists see it, How agnostics see it, How staunch believers of various faith perceive it. So I am going to try a hand in explaining what I feel and believe. It is heavily influenced by past thinkers from India notably Adi sankara, (known as Sankaracharya). The spark to write which was present for a long time, got a push when I couldn’t make a friend understand something which I wanted to tell about God. Happy Reading.</p> <p align="justify">First and foremost, God is not a tribal leader to rule you, to grant you your wishes when you bow in front of him, to punish you if you don’t kneel down in front of him. He is not a jailer either and he doesn’t have a file for you to note down the good deeds and bad deeds and weigh you in terms of that and thereby to sent you to Hell or Heaven.. There is no hell with burning cauldron nor a heaven with virgins and wine. Even death in Sanskrit is called Yama, which is nothing but “Time”. It will come at its own time. </p> <p align="justify">Having said that, let me talk about Hinduism as religion, it is not a religion. Nothing revolutionary, it is not a religion just because it is not centered around a prophet or god, its a socio-cultural way of living which is being followed in south Asia for ages with foundation based on not just one single book. The religion is more called as Sanathana Dharma by certain scriptures (which means eternal religion), There is no mentioning of the word Hindu in any of the Vedas and the following literature. By the way, Can a single book explain everything we need to live and understand about God? No way! So there are many sacred books in Hinduism rather than one, The foundation is based on Vedas,</p> <p align="justify">There are four Vedas</p> <ol> <li> <div align="justify">Rig Veda (1028 hymns and 10,600 verses)</div> <li> <div align="justify">Yajur Veda (Sacrificial Prayers, Around 2000 Verses)</div> <ol> <li> <div align="justify">Shukla Yajur Veda(White)</div> <li> <div align="justify">Krishna Yajur Veda (Black)</div></li></ol> <li> <div align="justify">Sama Veda(Around 1900 Verses)</div> <li> <div align="justify">Atharva Veda(760 hymns, few as verses, few as prose)</div></li></ol> <p align="justify">Can just Four books of so many verses explain the entire way of living and cosmos, No, So there are Brahmanas, which are commentaries on these Vedas, They are 16 in number(If I am right) which may be written in the form of Samhitas (collections). Apart from this there are Vedanta, Upanishads, Aranyakas. Then after that came Vedangas(which means limbs of Vedas) they consist of grammar, phonetics, astrology etc. Then there are Parisistas which when translated means supplement. Then there are 18 Puranas which gives details of creation and destruction of universe. Then there are Upavedas which are four in number, The famed Ayurveda comes under this. Then there are the Ithihasas which means history, under this comes the great epics of Mahabharata and Ramayana. </p> <p align="justify">The size of Ramayana and Mahabharata itself is pretty amazing, it is pretty foolish to compare it with Iliad and odyssey of Homer. Mahabharata alone is ten times longer than Iliad and Odyssey combined, with more than 90,000 verses and 1.8 million words. Sadly, many of the ancient texts are not present anymore due to various reasons, destruction of ancient universities in Nalanda and elsewhere is one of the reason.</p> <p align="justify">So, coming back, these books though form the basis of Hinduism( I’ll use the term Hinduism due to convenience) is not closed for questioning, one can question, argue, doubt and comment on it. That is why there is mentioning of atheism, agnosticism in Hinduism. After all, Hinduism as I know, is not monotheistic but can be so, is not Pantheistic but can be so, is not atheistic but can be so. </p> <p align="justify">Upanishads mention God not as what it is but what it is not, Which is easier, It mentions God as follows, </p> <p align="justify"><i>That which makes the tongue speak, but which cannot be spoken by the tongue...<br>That which makes the mind think, but which cannot be thought by the mind...<br>That which makes the eyes see, but which cannot be seen by the eyes...<br>If you understand the meaning of I neither know nor don't know, then you understand God. <br>Those who know that God cannot be known, truly know God.</i></p> <p align="justify">When I mentioned Atheism, what I meant was the belief of lack of super-human intervention of God in Human life. In other words, God is whatever is present and whatever is not present, in short God is the universe, just like one of my friend explained that God is like a spider’s web, The spider creates the web and lives in it and also is a part of it. </p> <p align="justify">Also you might have noticed that God is mentioned as ‘that’ and ‘it’, and not as any he or she, Vedas call God by various names such as Nirguna- attributeless, Nirvikara- Opinionless, Nirakara- formless, Ananta- Infinite. </p> <p align="justify">But few people in Hinduism pray to the attributes of Universe, like Sun, Rain, Fire etc. Few scholars in the past propounded atheism to remove this stigma. But in actual Hinduism is neither atheistic nor theistic but it be called as trans-theistic.</p> <p align="justify">In Hinduism, you can consider those forces as also God, after all, it is part of the universe, so it is part of God, so it is God. There is a verse as follows,</p> <p align="justify">Ekam sat vipraa: Bahuda Vadanti</p> <p align="justify">which when translated means, <strong>Truth is one, People say it in different ways.</strong></p> <p align="justify">Now as the time passed, the message of truth was lost in the lineage, So to makes things easier for the common man to understand, scholars built ways, so that common man can understand and reach the truth. Most importantly four philosophies were developed from four Vedas by Adi Sankara, those being,</p> <ul> <li> <div align="justify">Prajñānam Brahma - <strong>Brahman is knowledge</strong></div> <li> <div align="justify">Aham Brahmasmi- <strong>I am Brahman</strong></div> <li> <div align="justify">Tat Tvam Asi-<strong>That thou art</strong></div> <li> <div align="justify">Ayamātmā Brahma-<strong>This Atman is Brahman</strong></div></li></ul> <p align="justify">All the four are based on Advaita ( which means non-duality), Buddhism loosely dwells on this monistic way of thinking. Many Hindu conventional people criticized on his thoughts mentioning it as radical. But the same Upanishads and Vedas have the same arguments which those opponents couldn’t see. Sankara created these schools of thought based on <em>sastra</em> (scriptures), <i>yukti</i> (reason) and <i>anubhava</i> (experience), and aided by <i>karmas</i> (spiritual practices).</p> <p align="justify">In fact, the entire Hindu religion was modeled to follow these schools of thought, the temples, idols were created to follow these philosophical and scientific traditions, though people forgot or are unaware of the reasons behind these traditions which paved way for the radicals of present day to consider some of it as superstitious due to its lack of purpose or reason is a sad state. Also there are right-wing Hindus who blindly believes in certain traditions which may have been relevant at a different point of time for a different socio-cultural reason is a sad state. </p> <p align="justify">There is a temple in south Kerala deep in jungle, the pilgrims need to trek 4-5kms( it was around 20-40kms, before the roads were paved) to reach the temple, the trek is hard and laborious in the deep jungle, and before the trek the pilgrim is supposed to take 41 day of observing hard rites including but not limited to celibacy. Once the pilgrim reaches the sanctum sanctorum very tired and exhausted, He is greeted by a message written in Devanagari script “तत्वमसि” which is “Tat Tvam Asi”. The pilgrim is not greeted by promises of gifts and blessings, but by this simple philosophical thought/truth.</p> <p align="justify"> </p> <p align="justify">- A believer, Santhosh K Ramachandran</p> <p align="justify">Sources: Wikipedia, Few blogs, Few Hindu websites, Few original thoughts.</p> <p align="justify">I may add one more part to this, considering opinions and comments, also am having a small doubt that I haven’t expressed what I wanted to…</p> <div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:1ecdf3a8-4443-41cf-88f5-55e0fa70e0f4" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/hinduism" rel="tag">hinduism</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/concept+of+god" rel="tag">concept of god</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/life" rel="tag">life</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/atheism" rel="tag">atheism</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/pantheism" rel="tag">pantheism</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/hindu" rel="tag">hindu</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/tat+tvam+asi" rel="tag">tat tvam asi</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/etc" rel="tag">etc</a></div> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-59854411521233711772009-06-15T22:13:00.001-07:002009-06-15T22:13:52.140-07:00Questions and Answers..!!<p> </p> <p>We all ask questions, do we always ask for answers? May be Yes, may be No.</p> <p> </p> <p>We don’t like to be questioned, whether its a History class, or where the stapler is when we are busy watching the movie, or about our attitude towards other people which includes our parents, dear ones and enemies, or even the intricate questions about life and existence, or going further we don’t even like to be questioned about our very own actions.</p> <p>But, when someone asks a generic abstract question whose answer is non-existent or is trivial or tickles human perception and mind, he feels he is being intelligent to put up such a question in front of other people. May be his motive was innocent or he is just at awe when he wonders about the lopsided nature of questions and answers. </p> <p>In our life, we ask more questions than we ever answer, It is either in a process of gathering information, or in a process of having a discussion or providing information to others in a thought provoking manner.</p> <p>So, Thinking about answers, are there answers ? something in me tells that there is answer to every question possible.(For sensible qns). But sometimes certain questions which are not sensible may be sensible at a future point of time. How do we find an answer to a question? That is a prudent question.</p> <p>How did Aryabhatta find the value of Pi? How did he find Zero? </p> <p>How did Kekule find the structure of Benzene?</p> <p>How did Einstein propound Relativity..?</p> <p>These are works of great personalities of various times, On a common scale, How did you find the answers to simple questions you face everyday?<br></p> <p>Like, the amount of salt, direction to your office, your thirst level, your sub-conscious driving..! </p> <p><strong>Its in you..</strong> The answer is within you..! Whenever you hear an answer, until and unless you believe it with faith and conviction, that is not an answer for you. </p> <p>So the answer is within you..! For how much you see, smell, taste, hear and feel, the mind inside you, need to comprehend and digest to make it truth for yourself. No matter whether its engraved in gold or rock, Its your conviction in the end that matters, may be that is why we have so many religions, gods, rituals and superstitions....</p> <p>As I told, you can find answer to anything, any situation, any question, any problem, any challenge, any hurdle…all you need is a clear thoughtful mind…</p> <p>Stop Googling, Start searching within you..!! </p> <p>-Santhosh K Ramachandran (keep probing)</p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-18914463809615137462009-05-22T18:35:00.001-07:002009-05-22T18:35:41.493-07:00Choice…!<p align="justify">In your life, you always make choices, everyday, every moment you make choices out of your experiences, your education, from the training you have got, the instinct feeling you carry. You remember very few choices you have made, those important ones especially related to your career, love life, relationships, etc. On a spiritual, meta-physical level, what makes you take that choice or decision. </p> <p align="justify">Is it the <strong>fate</strong>?</p> <p align="justify">Is it your <strong>karma?</strong> based on your past and present life.</p> <p align="justify">Is it really <strong>written</strong>? just like in the “The alchemist”</p> <p align="justify">Is it based on <strong>planetary positions</strong>?</p> <p align="justify">or is it really your very own <strong>logical choice</strong> out of your mind? which you have no idea where it came from…!</p> <p align="justify">Or even worse, is it based on <strong>emotions </strong>designed specifically to overwhelm logic and reason?</p> <p align="justify">On an ironical note, you don’t have the choice of your color or physical appearance, no matter what the plastic surgeon or dermatologist claims. </p> <p align="justify">You don’t have the choice to what race you are going to be born, you don’t have the choice where you want to be born, you don’t have the choice of caste or religion of your parents which you are most probably going to follow.</p> <p align="justify">Even you don’t make the choice of your very own name, by which the entire world is going to know you by.</p> <p align="justify">Most of the violence and homicide of 20th century is based on the first two statements, which is not even your own choice. </p> <p align="justify">If you have a political or philosophical belief, fight for it, no problem !!! (still, No Violence plz) Its your very own goddamn choice.</p> <p align="justify">I normally ask people an “OR” question, so as to see how they make the choice…! Try it, and lets find the answers.</p> <p align="justify">Since you have made the choice of reading this completely, Thank you and congrats.</p> <p align="justify"><em>"You're not here to find out what your choice is. You have already made the choice. You're here to find out why you made that choice."</em></p> <p align="justify"><em>-Oracle in Matrix</em></p> <p align="justify"><strong>-Santhosh K Ramachandran</strong></p> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-70719558359692847912009-03-07T13:41:00.001-08:002009-03-07T13:41:04.004-08:00Cause n Effect..!<blockquote></blockquote> <p> “I’ve always believed in cause and effect, or more formal way of expressing it by the terms causality, action and reaction. Sometimes it is too literal. For example, consider the sequential events of work and fatigue. That kind of events which are literal and more physical are easier to understand, follow, plan and execute because of the logic supporting it.”</p> <p>But what about deeds? what about all those meta-physical things which are only supported by the reasoning put forward by the philosophers from time immemorial. That kind of causality makes it more intriguing, and quite questionable! No matter how many examples are put forward to prove that, it can be disproved with the help of stating it as mere coincidence.</p> <p>So is it just coincidence, Nope. The world and all its beings, the entire cosmos, the life, the human mind, its actions and thoughts are not just mere coincidence. Those who believe it as coincidence are just lazy enough to find the truth. </p> <p>Now listen, The entire system is not here because of Genesis, those who have read Genesis( The first part in Bible) will acknowledge what is written below. </p> <p>“God creates light and separates light from darkness, and day from night, on the first day. Yet he didn't make the light producing objects (the sun and the stars) until the fourth day” (<a href="http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/1.html#14">1:14-19</a>), (<a href="http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/gen/1.html#3">1:3-5</a>)</p> <p>See, If you follow Bible for answers, you will be following these illogical reasoning which any educated person will call as absurdity. <a href="http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/abs/long.htm" target="_blank">check the link</a></p> <p>But there can be stupid logic as well, For example.</p> <p><em>“The Holy Religion of the Invisible Pink Unicorn is based upon both Logic and Faith. We have Faith that She is Pink; and we Logically know that She is Invisible, because we can't see Her.”</em></p> <p>Isn’t every religion based on something like that. The above statement about that holy religion cannot be disproved, If someone argues about it, what can you answer rather than scream or laugh over it.</p> <p>But good deeds will give you fruitful results, after all there is no harm in doing something good. Every religion thankfully support it. In Hinduism it speaks about moksha, nirvana and escaping from the continuous birth cycles. It also says that the actions performed in this birth will result in the status of your next life.</p> <p>But what is promising is the statement in Gita which tells that good deeds will help you in this life as well. This statement was made famous by the father of atomic bomb Oppenheimer.</p> <p>The quote says:</p> <p><em>“In battle, in the forest, at the precipice in the mountains, On the dark great sea, in the midst of javelins and arrows, In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame, The good deeds a man has done before defend him</em> “</p> <p>-Gita</p> <p>So even if you escape the laws of the constitution created by mortals, you can’t escape the laws of nature. </p> <p>P.S. Let there be peace..!</p> <div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:59a6be93-6039-4d3e-9caf-785719dc9c16" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/cause+and+effect" rel="tag">cause and effect</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/gita" rel="tag">gita</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/atheism" rel="tag">atheism</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/logic" rel="tag">logic</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/hindusim" rel="tag">hindusim</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/bible" rel="tag">bible</a></div> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-80397399645322669482009-03-01T14:19:00.003-08:002009-03-01T14:19:19.878-08:00Life<p>What is life..?</p> <p>A gift, a coincidence, a planned purposeful element in a larger scheme of things, an effect of subsequent actions during the course of billion years..</p> <p>No one knows its purpose, no one is even sure that the purpose of life is to find the purpose and perform it.</p> <p>The question of destiny, salvation, the sciences, the intricacies, the complexities, the human illusions, the creator, the dimensions, the god, the right, the wrong, light, sound, warmth, cold, the meaning of time, the outer space, the inner mind, happiness, sadness, anger, passion, lust, and all those numerous emotions, nothing has been explained to full amount of satisfaction.</p> <p>Why..why is that not possible..?</p> <p> </p> <p>Is it because the human mind is hard to satisfy..?</p> <p>Or isn’t the language capable of explaining those things..!</p> <p>OR is it that the truth is already out there, and the problem being that everyone is not capable of comprehending and accepting the truth.</p> <p>OR is it following the theory that the universe will change to something more bizarre once it is fully comprehended, and that one such understanding of the universe had already occurred in the past.</p> <p>Or is it that the design of the whole system also involves an element of incomprehensibility…</p> <p>As one can see..The situation is so complex and out of the world that the problem itself is so complex and invites many possibilities that one even can’t imagine about the solution..!</p> <p>So..what am I going to do now, Rush to finish my take home exam..! </p> <p> </p> <p></p> <div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:31c65388-57dc-40fa-b21d-3852ad457a69" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/life" rel="tag">life</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/mystery" rel="tag">mystery</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/incomprehensibility" rel="tag">incomprehensibility</a></div> Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-16081626326470900812009-01-17T16:08:00.000-08:002009-01-17T17:14:52.893-08:00Disclaimer..!<div style="text-align: justify;">I am a human being made up of cells, blood, tissues, organs, skin, membranes, hormones, fluids and "god knows what" in a complicated manner. Of which few are controlled by a mind, which supposedly has something to do with the the neural activity happening in my brain. This manifestation occurred around 22 years ago which might have been destroyed generations back and might have got re-manifested in this fashion( Not the body, but the soul). So my thoughts are unique, stupid, special, weird..all of those..!!<br /><br />So, The whole point is that whatever I am writing in this blog are my <span style="font-style: italic;">'point of view'</span>, which few might agree, thank you, <span style="font-style: italic;">"you don't have to pay me anything"</span> ! and also few might disagree, thank you to you people too, coz disagreement leads to the ultimate truth. But who knows the truth? But if someone is speaking truth, how can we know it is the truth. After all human race is so stubbornly demanding empirical proof to all that has been said, written or even thought. or else they foolishly accepts the popular one(Democracy at its worst.)<br /><br />So you can copy, paste, cut, reproduce electronically via the print media or through the word of mouth whatever content which is there in the blog(You don't have to pay me), If you have questions, feel free to ask, If you want to show your anger, shout at me rather than on some poor guy on the street! <span style="font-style: italic;">(sounds like a dialogue from Gandhi)</span>. If you want to hit me, Plz don't do it.! If you want to laugh over what I have written, share with me too, (Plz, lemme too have a laugh.!)<br /><br />If you don't like the template, the picture, if there is a broken link, if there is something you find amiss, do let me know, I may or may not help, But don't stop from what you were going to do. I don't hope to change the world through this blog, The world is on a downward spiral (Its Kaliyuga, may be that's why I was born. Ha Ha...) <span style="font-weight: bold;">But don't tell me what I can or cannot write.</span> But even if you tell me, that is not going to stop me. So express your opinions, anger, thoughts, concerns, wishes, hopes, likes, dislikes or whatever you want to tell me about this blog , or about me or about the world.<br /><br />Don't worry, Lets overload the Google server in california..!!<br /><br />Why am I writing this disclaimer, somebody prompted! I dunno, Who is bothered? Do you care..??<br /><br />After all Lets share, learn, argue, debate, lets do that till dawn.<br /><br /><span style="font-style: italic;"> Intelligence is relative</span><br /> -Burn after reading<br /><br />So are many things..! like force, love, temperature, wind, gravity, sight, light, end, function, shift, control, space (those are things from keyboard, is it...oops..!!)<br /><br />But finally..! <span style="font-weight: bold;">does that matter?</span>, Will that bring you rice tomorrow??<br /><br />No...then what? I dunno as of nw..! Am I crazy, Did I miss tablets, Did the nut go loose??<br /><br />Ha ha ha..!! ROFL..!!!<br /><br />-Santhosh K Ramachandran.<br /></div>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-91433636097003780082009-01-08T14:29:00.000-08:002009-01-08T19:30:25.216-08:00Hope..!<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Hope- "it is the quintessential human delusion, simultaneously the source of your greatest strength and your greatest weakness."</span><br />We call ourselves rational beings, but 'to hope' is neither rational nor logical. May be that's what makes us human beings.<span style="font-style: italic;"> "What an Irony..!"</span><br />Hope, Its the topmost thing in anyone's survival kit, even surpassing <span style="font-style: italic;">swiss army</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">knife <span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;">and </span></span></span>a <span style="font-style: italic;">bottle of pure water</span>.<br /><br />What is hope?<br /><br />It is one of the three theological virtues(in Christianity) along with LOVE and FAITH.<br />It is the human involvement on the future(on a time scale) emotionally.<br />Hope is not optimism, that is why I preferred to say emotionally, because optimism is a rational thing.<br />Hope is a beautiful "<span style="font-style: italic;">maya</span>" to keep one going.<br />Many people find hope in a variety of things.<br />In god, In a poster, In nature, In the clouds in sky, In medicine, In food, In music, In People(parents, friends, teachers, students, colleagues, strangers, Sachin tendulkar), In words, In eyes, In a metaphysical force, And above all in the <span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">future</span>.<br /><br />Since Hope is more of a human thought,emotion... It is meant to affect or at least try to affect the events so as to bring the future to one's wish, demand or request. May be that is <span style="font-weight: bold;">hope</span>.<br /><br />It sometimes seem to take the 4th dimension(time) into its hands. Which is not quite possible empirically. But I am not sure how it is influenced or affected; Through prayers, controlling cosmological elements and/or worldly factors. But it sometimes does get affected, few people call it coincidence(and they proudly calls themselves realists); few call it divine intervention; few call it the power of sub-conscious mind.<br /><br />Whatever it is, We continue to hope.. The last resort of any wounded phoenix (before rising from the ashes)Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-4699921857389622162009-01-03T14:58:00.000-08:002009-01-03T15:35:26.657-08:00Freedom..!When I was asked, what is the most valuable thing in one's life. I could come up with three answers, the first one was <span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>Freedom</b></i></span>, the second one was <span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>Hope</b></i></span> and the third one was <span style="font-size: large;"><i><b>Change</b></i></span>..! <br />
<br />
Freedom..!<br />
<br />
It is the most important thing in the world for the one who is deprived of it, So if it is considered pretty significant, does that mean that a large chunk of world population doesn't own it. Sadly the answer is 99.99% doesn't own it, to varying levels.<br />
<br />
So the question arise, what is actually freedom, what is independence, what has that to do with greed, what are limitations, what has the society done to it. The entire analysis of that particular word can take the entire human history as the reference!<br />
<br />
Freedom or birth rights, The freedom of the press( does that include paparazzi,gossiping), freedom of the country(does that overlap with terrorism?) freedom from limitations imposed by parents, freedom to hold a gal's hand without inviting second look, freedom to choose, freedom from your spouse(sometimes), freedom to smoke, freedom to hunt, freedom to kill people, freedom to kill oneself, freedom to blaspheme, freedom to mug, lie, rob and rape...!<br />
<br />
You could see people at one point in their life, may or may not accept to each of this "freedom" to do these things.<br />
<br />
It doesn't look good, doesn't it?<br />
<br />
So the rules and laws came into place, Ruling came into place, Constitution came into the world, Democracy came into the world.<br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>Whatever it is, my urge to write on this topic came long back, when I was a teenager, when I was given limitations and most importantly when I started to think of my marriage(another law in the society) is going to be with a gal chosen by my parents.(Another freedom stolen)</i><br />
<br />
As you have noticed, the percentage I had given in the beginning was 99.99%, so what about the rest 0.01%, They are those lucky ppl who have found meaning to their life on a transcendental state, controlling their senses against lust, money and anger. Leading a life outside this material world, free from bondage, renounced from bodily comforts, <b>Detached..That is freedom,</b><br />
<br />
They are on their path to supreme abode on whatever path they have chosen, Either through <i>Jnana</i><b>(Knoweldge), </b><i>Karma</i><b>(Action), </b><i>Bhakti</i><b>(Devotion)</b>. <br />
<br />
So let me take small small steps on that regard, by controlling my anger..! That is easier and beneficial.<br />
<br />
P.S: Posting on the eve of finishing "Gita" for the second time, (<i>I am at awe, every time I read it) </i>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-11780970293210716772008-12-22T19:18:00.002-08:002009-01-03T15:56:36.008-08:00Journey Called Life..! Part-1<div style="text-align: left;"><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:cMr9u15MZiW0CM:http://k43.pbase.com/u40/andass/large/26296475.PICT8532awithwords.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:cMr9u15MZiW0CM:http://k43.pbase.com/u40/andass/large/26296475.PICT8532awithwords.jpg" /></a></div></div>When I talk about traveling or journey, I don't necessarily mean, traveling in a vehicle, but it can be an emotional journey, intellectual journey or a blissful spiritual journey, I am trying to start my journey of sharing my spiritual journey through this blog.<br />
<br />
So let me start this endeavor by mentioning that large scale traveling started after the industrial revolution.<br />
<br />
But even before people ventured beyond the narrow confines of their own villages and communities there was a realization that life itself is a journey. A journey we take one step and one day at a time.<br />
<br />
Life is like a journey, and your experiences are like different parts of that journey.<br />
We are all on a journey. For some, the journey will be full of great things – rewarding careers, loving family, active social lives. Sometimes it may feel as if life just couldn't get any better.<br />
<br />
Others may have grown weary and hold little hope for what each day may bring. Still many others are probably somewhere in-between.<br />
<br />
The choices we make along the way greatly affect our journey. Each choice has an impact on our lives and the lives of those around us. And the most important choice we will ever make on this journey is the choice we make about our relationship with God.<br />
<br />
<br />
Probably because life is so much like a journey, there are many expressions we use that conjure up images of traveling. Consider these different turns of phrase; they all use the key idea of journey while talking about life:<br />
<br />
* Let's cross that bridge when we come to it, shall we?<br />
* My grandparents are a bit over the hill.<br />
* His life has no direction at the moment.<br />
* I don't know which way to turn!<br />
* You just have to forget about it and move on.<br />
* His beloved dog passed away in the night.<br />
* I set out to do the right thing.<br />
* When I left school I found myself at a crossroads.<br />
* A lovely baby girl arrived at 2 o'clock this afternoon.<br />
<br />
The Chinese have a saying which says ‘The journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step.' <br />
<br />
You are already well on your way. You have already traveled from your mother's womb, through babyhood, negotiated the tricky path of infancy and childhood, and now stand on the threshold of adolescence and adulthood.<br />
<br />
<br />
As you journey through life remember to take each step carefully, travel light and remember the need for something to guide you. Just as ancient sailors used the stars to help them navigate and modern explorers use maps, Hindus look to the Gita, Christians look to the Bible, Muslims to their Quran to guide them through life.<br />
<br />
What guides your journey through life? Your parents? Your friends? TV? or the above mentioned scriptures, Whatever it is, make sure its guidance keeps you 'on the straight and narrow' path.<br />
<br />
Remarkable thoughts:<br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>We may run, walk, stumble, drive or fly, but let us never lose sight of the reason for the journey, or miss a chance to see a rainbow on the way</i>.-Gloria Gaither<br />
<i><br />
</i><br />
<i>Don't run through life so fast that you forget not only where you've been, but also where you're going. Life is not a race, but a journey to be savored each step of the way</i>. -Nancye Sims<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5581569168417784181.post-60978740105756753622008-12-22T19:18:00.001-08:002009-01-03T15:56:50.344-08:00Tat Tvam Asi<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: 130%;"><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;">तत्वमसि</span><span style="font-family: arial; font-weight: bold;"> </span><br />
</span> </div><br />
Thou Art That- My title of the blog. So precisely named for my spiritual journey.<br />
<br />
<i>(This post is about why I chose this title)</i><br />
<br />
I trying to be a diplomatic person don't want my readers to have any conceptions or perceptions in their mind arising due to the title of the blog except for the true purpose,<br />
that,<br />
<ol><li> I am not trying to tell that I am part of God, hence I am God.</li>
<li>God is in me, Hence I am God.</li>
<li>I am part of God, so whatever unworthy acts I do are done by God.</li>
<li>I am part of God, so whatever quality god possesses, I too possess.</li>
</ol>No!<br />
<br />
But I know one thing. Just like vedas mentioning God as shapeless, formless, limitless. Because god is just indescribable.<br />
I can tell that the "meaning" cannot be found by objective experience and experimentation but by intuitive analysis only.<br />
So this brings us to a point to look at one's own self, inner mind, the strata of brain which brings out what few people call "intuition".<br />
<br />
<b style="color: red;">Hence the title.</b><br />
<br />
So let me ask myself(my thought processing cells) questions through this blog, since I am part of this large conspiracy of <b>"existence"</b>, <b>"god"</b> and <b>"Life"</b><i> (I am not sure whether there is any difference in the mentioned three "things")</i><br />
<br />
<b style="color: red;">Hence the title.</b><br />
<br />
As I'd like to quote from various scholars, Here goes the 1st one..!<br />
<br />
"You cannot teach a man anything, you can only help him find it within himself"- Galileo Galilei<br />
<br />
<b style="color: red;">Hence the title.</b><br />
<br />
"It is through science that we prove, but through intuition that we discover"- H. Poincare<br />
<br />
<b style="color: red;">Hence the title.</b>Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12027683567046078030noreply@blogger.com0